The Gospel of John – Portrait of Christ

Class 3

 

CHAPTER 4

Departure from Judea (4:1-4)

The rapid growth of Jesus’ popularity caused the Pharisees to begin their hatred and opposition to him on account of their jealous.  Jesus undoubtedly knew how his ministry would end, so he planed his time carefully and strategically.  To avoid a confrontation, Jesus traveled north returning to Galilee.

 

Interestingly, verse 4 indicates that Jesus “had to pass” through Samaria.   The Greek e[dei which means logical necessity rather than personal obligation points to the unfolding of God's plan in Jesus 'ministry. (See for example: 3:7, 14, 30; 4:4, 20, 24; 9:4; 10:16; 12:34; and 20). 

 

There was profound contempt between the Jews and the Samaritans.

 

 (Bible Knowledge Commentary) - This was the shortest route from Judea to Galilee but not the only way. The other route was through Perea, east of the Jordan River. In Jesus’ day the Jews, because of their hatred for the Samaritans, normally took the eastern route in order to avoid Samaria. But Jesus chose the route through Samaria in order to reach the despised people of that region.

 

Jesus’ Second Personal Interview (4:5-42)

Sychar was between Mount Ebal and Mount Gerizim. A well near Sychar today may be the same as Jacob’s well. The plot of ground which Jacob gave to Joseph is mentioned in See Genesis 48:21-22.

 

Tenny - persistence of Jesus was demonstrated in His appeals to her. He began on the ground of her kindness. “Give me to drink” is a request that would be granted to almost anybody. One would scarcely deny a cup of cold water to his worst enemy.  She gave Him what He asked, but could not resist the opportunity to have a little fun with it. “How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, who am a Samaritan woman?” (9) In other words, “We Samaritans are to you the scum of the earth, but we will serve well enough when you are thirsty! There was a sting hidden in her jest.

 

If thou knewest . . . “The mere hint that He knew something that she did not know was suffi­cient to change her attitude from badinage to serious inquiry. Curiosity appeared in her reply. “Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep: whence then hast thou that living water? Art thou greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well . . . ?“ (11, 12).

 

Jesus appealed to her desire. “Every one that drinketh of this water shall thirst again: but whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall become in him a well of water springing up unto eternal life”

(13, 14).

 

Living Water – Rich imagery based upon the idea of the supernatural, life-giving, power of God in the Old Testament.  "Living water", as a biblical image, speaks of God, his grace,

New life and the transforming power of the Holy Spirit. See: Jer 2:13-14; Isa 55:1-2; Zechariah 14:18)

 

Verse 11 - Like the Jews and Nicodemus before her, the Samaritan woman misunderstands the key terms Jesus uses [1]

 

John 4:16   Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither. Tenny - If she wanted badly enough what He had to offer, she would be willing to exert herself to obtain it. His command, taken at face value, called for a walk of a mile in the hot sun with only the word of a stranger to make it worth while….Designed to reveal her private life and its sin. 

 

Tenny - Her reaction was that of sullen withdrawal. The curt an­swer, “I have no husband,” containing four words in English and three in Greek, was spoken probably with a tone of keen resentment. The reply was true, but was intended as a screen for her own falsity. She did not wish to be investigated, least of all by a Jew.

 

John 4:17-18 Jesus said to her, "You have well said, 'I have no husband'; [18] for you have had five husbands, and the one whom you now have is not your husband; this you have said truly."   Jesus’ use of his prophetic knowledge shocked her, unveiled her dysfunctional life and need, and at the same time proved that he was no ordinary man. 

 

Shocked and shamed she seeks to divert him to an age long theological debate between the Jews and Samaritans regarding the place of worship.   John 4:20 "Our fathers worshiped in this mountain, and you people say that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship."

 

Tenny -. In effect, He said, “If you really want to know the truth about worship, you will find it not in the formula of our fathers, but in the relation of your own heart with God. You must deal with Him through His Spirit, and on the basis of truth, which precludes the kind of a life that you are living now.”

 

New Geneva Study Bible - the hour is coming, and now is. The time is soon coming when divisions between Jews and Samaritans will be removed (v. 21), and the temple worship will be superseded. The time “now is” because Jesus is present and has begun the work leading to the presence of the Holy Spirit in the church (7:39; 20:22).

§ 4:24 must worship in spirit and truth. “True” worship is contrasted with the worship regulated by the temporary provisions of the law, especially the separation of Jews and Gentiles and the requirement of temple worship at Jerusalem. The ceremonial and sacrificial aspects of the law were not false; they were temporary and provisional. Worship “in spirit” is worship in the Holy Spirit. He continues the work begun by Jesus (14:16–18; Acts 2:33). Prominent marks of the age of the Spirit are the removal of the barrier between Jews and Gentiles, and the ability of Christians to worship without the need for a temple of any kind.[2]

Tenny - “L know that Messiah cometh . . . when he is come, he will declare unto us all things” (25). The words were a confession both of ignorance and of hope.

Verse 26 – (B.K.C.) 4:26. This self-declaration by Jesus Himself—I… am He (the Messiah)—is unusual. Normally in His ministry in Galilee and Judea (cf. 6:15) because of political implications, He veiled His office and used the title “Son of Man.” But with this Samaritan the dangers of revolt by national zealots were not a problem.

Verses 27-30 - With the arrival of the disciples she leaves (leaving the water pot, she intends on returning) and goes and tells her neighbors.  Saying…A Man who told me everything I ever did, this would be sure to excite interest…Also she says…Could this be the Christ? She asked them. More literally, her question was, “This couldn’t be the Messiah, could it?” The question expected a tentative negative answer.

 

My food… is to do the will of Him who sent Me. This does not mean Jesus had no need of physical food, but rather that His great passion and desire was to do God’s will

Verse 35 - Four months more and then the harvest was probably a local proverb. But in the spiritual realm there is no long wait. Jesus has come so now it is the day of opportunity. All that is needed is spiritual vision and perception. If the disciples would look around, they would see people with spiritual hunger. The Samaritans in their white garments coming from the village (v. 30) may have visually suggested a wheat field ripe for harvest.

4:42 the Savior of the world. They recognized that Jesus was more than a prophet (vv. 19, 29, 39); He is the Savior (1 John 4:14).[3]

The Nobleman of Capernaum 4:43-54

Tenny - The third interview of Jesus which closed the series of His public presentations took place in Galilee two days after the visit in Samaria…. The key to the healing of the nobleman’s son is given in the word “again” in verse 46. The report of the first miracle in Cana, coupled with the rumors that had come back from Jeru­salem, had established the reputation of Jesus as a healer and wonder worker.

The nobleman was possibly a courtier of Herod the Te­trarch. His interest in Jesus was prompted by the sickness of his son,   Jesus was weary of being solicited for an exhibition of His powers, and His brusque reply was a protest against the popular feeling concerning Him. “Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will in no wise believe” (48). He did not want to be regarded only as a worker of miracles or marvels while the message of His person was rejected.

 

The rejoinder of the nobleman revealed that he was no trifler. The language is heartfelt and emphatic: “Sir, come down ere my child die” (49). The ability of Jesus to perform supernatural deeds was no academic question to the nobleman; it meant the difference between life and death for his son.

 

The brief answer of Jesus, “Go thy way; thy son liveth” (50), put the man in a dilemma. If he took Jesus at His word, he did so with no assurance beyond that word that Jesus would do anything for him. If he refused to take Jesus at His word, he would insult the very man upon whom all his hopes de­pended, and so forfeit whatever benefits He might confer. With short and simple command Jesus put the nobleman in the position where he would be compelled to show real faith if he had any to show.

 

The encounter with the servants on the road showed that the nobleman’s faith was justified. Overjoyed that the boy had recovered, the father believed and his whole house (53).

 

 

CHAPTER 5

Chapter 5 begins a new chapter in the ministry of Jesus, now there is increasing controversy.   From debate and conflict to deadly clash the hostility of the religious leaders of Judah against Jesus increases and becomes apparent.  The stage for controversy is centered here around two events:  the healing at the pool of Bethesda and the feeding of the five thousand. 

The Man at the Pool 5:1-18

Verse 1 – There are differences of opinion about which feast is taking place since it is not named in the text but it is suggested that it could have been   it could have been the Feast of Tabernacles or even Passover.  It seems to have been one of the feasts which required pilgrimage. 

Verse 2 - Near the sheep gate there was a pool. There has been much debate over the location of this pool. In 1880 a painting depicting an angel troubling the water was discovered on the wall of the Church of St. Anne in Jerusalem. This discovery marked the site of the pool of Bethesda.[4]

 

The length of time that this man was sick must be considered significant – 38 years hopeless situation humanly speaking. 

 

Verse 6- Sudden and startling question “Would you be made whole?”  Designed to focus his hope on Jesus and to raise his hopes…Could blame the circumstances but does he have the will to be healed if he could be…

 

Verses 7-8 (BKC) Jesus then said… Get up! Pick up your mat and walk. His command carried with it the required enablement. As with dead Lazarus (11:43), Jesus’ word accomplished His will. This illustrates conversion. When people obey His command to believe, God works in and through His Word.

Geneva Study Bible - Jewish tradition had interpreted the Sabbath prohibition against work to forbid carrying burdens.[5]

 

(BKC) Muscles long atrophied were completely restored. Isaiah prophesied that in the days of the Messiah the lame would “leap like a deer” (See Isa. 35:1-7). Here in Jerusalem was a public sign that the Messiah had come.

 

Verse 10-14 - The man replied that anyone who could heal him instantaneously and completely also had the authority to tell him to carry his bed. The Jews did not ask, “Who healed you?” but rather, “Who told you to do this on the Sabbath?” The man did not know who healed him, and meanwhile, Christ had disappeared. The man goes to the Temple (probably to give thanks for healing) and meets Christ, who tells him not to continue in sin lest a worse thing come unto thee. Christ does not insinuate that he was sick thirty-eight years because of sin, but rather since his sins were forgiven, he must walk in a new life.[6]   Jesus is interested not merely in healing a person’s body. Far more important is the healing of his soul from sin.

 

16. Persecute Jesus. This verb (Gr diōkō) refers to continued hostile activity even to the point of death (sought to slay him).[7]

17–18. Christ answers by establishing His authority to work on the Sabbath. He was coequal with God the Father. The Jews were angered even more by this statement and sought the more to kill him.[8]

The Claims of Jesus 5:19-29

(Tenny) - The reply of Jesus to the accusations of the Jews contained not only a new ethical concept of the Sabbath, but also a new theology.

 

My Father worketh even until now, and I work,” indicated that He made the Father His pattern, and that He felt that the Father’s work constituted sufficient precedent and reason for His. His enemies understood what He meant, for they sought to kill Him because he had assumed the prerogatives of deity in calling God ‘his own Father.”

 

The Father is the source of all life and power, and has bestowed Himself upon the Son in unstinted measure. To the Son He has revealed His purpose and has committed into His hands power in salvation and authority in judgment. The Son, on the other hand, follows carefully the model set by the Father, shares equal honor with Him, and asserts Himself as Lord of the dead and of the living.

 

The Witnesses 5:30-47

Five witnesses are called forth to substantiate Jesus claim: 

Jesus – Verses 30-31

The Father – Verses 30-31 and 37-38 (Audible Voice?  SEE At baptism (Matt 3:17), transfiguration Matt 17:5, Triumphant Entry John 12:28

John the Baptist – Verses 32-35

His Works – Verse 36

Moses – Verse 39-47

 

The Feeding of the Five Thousand 6:1-15

6:1–9. Christ went across the Sea of Galilee to the vicinity of Bethsaida (Lk 9:10). The multitudes, impressed by His miracles, followed Him. Jesus went up into a mountain. From His high vantage point, Christ observed the crowd approaching and asked Philip if they had bread for the people to eat. Bread (Gr artos, flat, round bread like the shape of pancakes). Christ explained why He asked this question—to prove him (Gr peirazō, to put him to the test). The Lord knew what he would do and is now putting Philip’s faith to the test (Jas 1:2). A pennyworth (Gr dēnarios) was equivalent to one day’s wages (Mt 20:2, 9, 13). Philip claims that two hundred days of wages would not be enough to give each a little. Andrew brings a lad (not necessarily a little boy) who has five barley loaves, and two small fishes. Andrew recognizes that this is so little to meet the need of so many. One commentator describes the problem this way: “Duty is not measured by ability, and ability is not measured by the sum-total of our resources” (J. D. Jones, The Gospel According to St. Mark, Scripture Truth).

10–11. Christ now takes command of the situation and has everyone sit down. The Lord gave thanks. Note the prayer of thanksgiving occurs before the miracle. The miracle provided as much as they would, whereas Philip’s faith was so little.

12–14. The sufficiency of the miracle did not mean waste. All the leftovers were to be collected that nothing be lost. One should never waste God’s blessings. The people saw the miracle (Gr sēmeion, sign) and were impressed: They proclaimed Him as that prophet (Deut 18:15–18) and probably thought Him to be the Messiah.[9]

Tenny’s Summary – A great miracle which is the only one recorded by all four Gospels. 

1.)    Designed to test the personal reactions of the disciples

2.)    It was at the peak of his popularity

3.)    A spectacular miracle

Walking on the Water 6:16-24

To make Him king. The kingship of the Messiah was to be spiritual, not political. While accepting the title “King of Israel” (1:49), Jesus refused the offer of Satan (Matt. 4:8, 9; Luke 4:5, 6) and the misguided efforts of the people.[10]

Tenny - The “not yet” in verse 17 implied that the disciples were expecting Him to join them. Their anxiety was increasing as time passed because He had not come, and the wind was rising. The lake of Galilee was situated below sea level in a bowl in the hills, and the defiles between the hills acted as chimneys which directed the concen­trated blasts of wind down upon the water.

They had rowed three or three and a half miles, so they were in the middle of the lake.  This occurred in the “fourth watch” of the night, that is, between 3 and 6 o’clock in the morning (Matt. 14:25; Mark 6:48).  Rowing for hours and not getting very far.

 

Tenny - The appearance of Jesus must have been startling. Since they were pulling against the wind, they probably had their backs to it, and were looking back toward the shore which they had left several hours before. To see a figure approaching them, moving against the wind faster than the boat could travel, and rapidly overtaking them would be disconcerting if not unnerving. The greeting of Jesus was intended to assuage their fears and His entry into the boat insured their safe arrival.

 

See Psalm 107:25-31

 

The Bread of Life Discourse 6:22-71

Jesus interprets the miracle of the feeding of the five thousand.  THIS IS DIVIDED INTO THREE SECTIONS

First Section Verses 22-40 Dealing with the Crowd who would make him a food king.

Second Section Verses 41-59 deals with the Jews spoken in the synagogue at Capernaum 

Third Section Verses 60-71 Deals with the effect of his words and works on his disciples

Verses 22-66 Dealing with the Crowd who would make him a food king.

A new harshness appears in Jesus approach.  The design is to rattle these materialistic curiosity seekers who were infatuated with being self satisfied into reality.  Jesus draws the distinction between the material bread with its temporal satisfaction with spiritual nourishment which has permanent and eternal satisfaction. 

They did not understand the method…they thought that they could do the work of God by their own efforts (Verse 28), Jesus said that the method was trust in him. 

They did not understand the significance of the miracle and demand another “sign” as if they had not already seen one.  Moses gave manna why not Jesus?  Jesus said that he was the bread that nourished people for eternity not just in the here and now. 

They did not understand the source and object of true faith
Those whom the Father gave Him shall come to Him (37a).

Those who come to Him would be certain of welcome (37b).

His reason for appearing among men was to do the Father’s will (38).

The Father’s will was the preservation of those whom He had given to the Son (39).

This preservation is the guarantee of eternal life to the believer, sealed by the resurrection at the last day (39b).

Hendriksen writes:  A person cannot be saved unless he comes to Jesus; he cannot come unless he is given (cf. especially 6:44). But “all that” is given, certainly comes. The expression “all that” (see also 6:39; 7:2, 24; I John 5:4) views the elect as a unity; they are all one people. The clause, “And him who comes to me I will in no way cast out,” places the emphasis once more on human responsibility; as if to say, “Let no one hesitate, saying, ‘Perhaps I have not been given to the Son by the Father.’ Whoever comes is welcomed heartily” (I will in no way cast him out is another example of litotes). Note that verse 37 also teaches: a. that in working out the plan of redemption, so that salvation is bestowed upon the elect individuals and upon the entire elect race, there is complete harmony and cooperation between the Father and the Son:  Those whom the Father gives, the Son welcomes; and b. that the work of redemption cannot be frustrated by the unbelief of the Jews of which men­tion was made in the preceding verse: there is an elect race; a remnant will most certainly be saved.

 

Verses 41-60

The murmuring and complaining of the Jews parallels the journey of Israel in the wilderness.  They have two main complaints:  (1) His origin, (2) Eating his flesh…They objected to His claim to the Bread of life. 

The metaphor of eating and drinking is the best possible figure that can be employed to express the assimilation of one body by another, the method whereby life is transferred from the eaten to the eater. The literal eating of Jesus’ flesh and the drinking of His blood were not demanded. Jesus carefully explained that the process was analogous to His living by the Father and certainly eating and drinking could not be literally applied there.

Why wasn’t he clearer here, why did he speak in a metaphor rather than in direct and clear forms?  Tenny writes,It might be expected that His enemies would be mystified by His veiled statements, but it might also be expected that His disciples at least would be sufficiently stimulated by loyalty and curiosity to inquire further what He meant before abandoning Him altogether. John made clear that the defection was no surprise to Jesus. The unbelief of the disciples had been evident to Him from the very first, and His difficult utterances had been spoken for the avowed purpose of disclosing their true position. Their inability to persist in faith apart from the “gift” of the Father (65) was His explanation of unbelief. Unbelief is natural to the sinning heart; saving faith is the gift of God.

John 6:60 Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, this is a hard saying; who can hear it?

John 6:66 As a result of this many of His disciples withdrew, and were not walking with Him anymore.

To the Inner Circle Verses 67-71

(BKC) You do not want to leave too, do you? He framed this question to encourage their weak faith. The Twelve were affected by the apostasy of the many, and Jesus used that occasion to refine their faith.

6:68-69. Peter, as a spokesman, gave his confession of faith. The path may be difficult, but he was convinced that Jesus’ words lead to life. No one else has the gift of eternal life. “We have believed and have known” is a better translation of the Greek perfect tenses (niv: We believe and know). Peter was confident of the apostles’ commitment to Jesus as the Holy One of God.

6:70-71. Jesus then asked, have I not chosen you, the Twelve? John’s Gospel does not record Jesus’ choice of the Twelve. He assumed his readers knew the Synoptics or common church tradition (cf. Mark 3:13-19). This choice was not election to salvation, but was Jesus’ call to them to serve Him. Yet, He said, one of you is a devil! In the light of John 13:2, 27, Satan’s working in Judas was tantamount to Judas being the devil. In 6:70 the Greek does not have the indefinite article “a,” so it could be translated “one of you is Satan (devil).” Jesus’ knowledge of Judas (who was called Judas Iscariot because his father was Simon Iscariot) was still another example of His omniscience



[1]New Geneva study Bible. 1997, c1995 (electronic ed.). Thomas Nelson: Nashville

[2]New Geneva study Bible. 1997, c1995 (electronic ed.). Thomas Nelson: Nashville

[3]New Geneva study Bible. 1997, c1995 (electronic ed.). Thomas Nelson: Nashville

[4]KJV Bible commentary. 1997, c1994. Thomas Nelson: Nashville

[5]New Geneva study Bible. 1997, c1995 (electronic ed.). Thomas Nelson: Nashville

[6]KJV Bible commentary. 1997, c1994. Thomas Nelson: Nashville

[7]KJV Bible commentary. 1997, c1994. Thomas Nelson: Nashville

[8]KJV Bible commentary. 1997, c1994. Thomas Nelson: Nashville

[9]KJV Bible commentary. 1997, c1994. Thomas Nelson: Nashville

[10]New Geneva study Bible. 1997, c1995 (electronic ed.). Thomas Nelson: Nashville